site statistics

Pages

Tuesday, June 7, 2011

The Hangover Part II (2011)



Shallow. Dark. Unrealistic. Ribald. Hilarious. These five words encapsulate The Hangover Part two. The words shallow and unrealistic stand out to me. So the film didn’t really work for me. To those of you whom the words ribald and hilarious stand out, I recommend the film.

I find it hard to turn off my brain before watching a no-brainer. I am bombarded with questions regarding the plausibility of the film’s events. With The Hangover Part Two, each time I threw a question, it softly bounced off the screen; but I didn’t care. I was too engrossed in what was happening to even remember what it was that I wanted an answer to. The film switched off my brain. Starting from the same point as the prequel and ending at pretty much the same point, the film takes a similar journey, different in the number of bumps it encounters and the catastrophic nature of each. The screenplay is packed with dull dialogue but it tries mighty hard to torture its characters and awakens the sadist within us. Whether it is a moron getting sodomized by a tranny, a fingerless teenager being stuffed into a refrigerator or the ebbing pulse of a crack addict, we grin with pleasure. There’re extremely horrible parts but they’re so uncompromisingly horrible that you’re left in stitches. Well, that’s that. Now, I’ll tell you why it didn’t work for me. I expect a film to have decent characterization, developed relationships and fairly good acting. The Hangover Part Two doesn’t have any of these. Ed Helms is effective at displaying high-strung emotions but that’s about it. Zach Galifianakis, who delivered his best performance with a cameo appearance in Up in the Air, is more of an unnecessary appendage than those of the transexuals in the film. The Hangover Part two’s saving grace is Mike Tyson. It isn’t a feat to be proud of, though. Even as the credits roll, you’re sitting there watching a montage of still photos; not because you care about the characters but because you can’t get enough of seeing them suffer.

Rating- 5/10

9 comments:

  1. I will take the "Ribald. Hilarious." part and take my chances with movie... I Enjoyed the first part .. With such Hilarious films i really dont bother abt the " how far from truth it is " part.
    Thanks for the review . Always a pleasure to read (with the exception of "How i Met your Mother" ;) )

    ReplyDelete
  2. I am not at all interested in this one, I haven't even seen the first, but I probably should soon. Great review!

    ReplyDelete
  3. As I thought this was a generic sequel. Very true review.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It was pretty good, i personaly like the change of setting but overall worth a watch easy. Nice work Rohit.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Great review, great blog ;p

    ReplyDelete
  6. Good review. We're debating whether to see this.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Great review..Thought the first was alright..so this one sounds definitely not worth having a look at.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I like the poster. Those three men in it kind of spoil it though. Don't think I'll see this movie.

    ReplyDelete

Large Association of Movie Blogs